COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

 

 

 

East Side Elementary

 

 

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2006-2009

 

 

 

________________________________________

Principal Signature

 

 
Revisions

 

___________

___________

___________

___________

 

________________________________________

Area Assistant Superintendent Approval

 

 

 


SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Table of Contents

 

 

Pages

PART 1

PROFILE

 

    Executive Summary ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ

3

    Significant AccomplishmentsÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ..

5

    Significant ChallengesÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.

6

    Organizational CharacteristicsÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ

7

    Student Performance Data Analysis ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ..ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ..

7-8

    Stakeholder Perceptual Data Analysis É..ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ..

9

PART 2

SCHOOL MISSION AND BELIEFSÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ...

10

PART 3

ACTION PLAN

 

    PrioritiesÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.

11

    Student Performance Action Plan: Goals ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ

12

    Student Performance Action Plan: Resource Plan ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ

13-14

    School Performance Action Plan: Goals ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ..

15

    School Performance Action Plan: Resource Plan ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ..

16-17

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ.

19 - 30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROFILE

Executive Summary

East Side Elementary School continuously analyzes informal and formal test data to develop our School Improvement Plan.  Each spring test results from numerous assessments are analyzed to identify strengths and weaknesses in student performance. The information is used to redirect teaching strategies and guide instruction.  Our school improvement data team disaggregates the data and shares results with the entire staff.  Once the test data is thoroughly reviewed, the staff decides upon areas of focus based on the identified weaknesses. 

 

Also included in the School Improvement Plan is East SideÕs new mission statement that was developed during the 2005-2006 school year – ÒBy addressing the needs of all children, East SideÕs community is committed to empowering our children to excel academically and become respectful, productive members of a global society.Ó  The administrative theme for our school this year is, ÒRefining the three ÒRÕsÓ:  Respect, Relationships, and Responsibility  By embracing these three character traits, we are creating a risk-free community that scaffolds the learning environment.

 

East Side Elementary has a large number of veteran teachers and has added many young, beginning teachers to the staff. This change in staff has generated excitement to our school with an increase of instructional conversations and sharing of best practices.  While this is a positive change, planning the support for these novice teachers is demanding. Because of the varying degrees of teaching experience we have made collaborative learning communities a pathway for staff development.

 

Our long-range school performance goal is:  Collaboration among inter/intra-grade level teams guided by the Georgia Performance Standards.  This goal was identified based upon the results of the Cobb County School District 2006 School Improvement Survey.  Collaboration will consist of teams developing essential questions, enduring understandings, performance tasks, varied assessments, and a good understanding of the overall elements of the Georgia Performance Standards. Grades 1-5 will continue to study and implement 6+1 Traits of Writing by Ruth Culham. Kindergarten students will become familiar with the language of the seven traits.  This writing program will provide our school with a common approach to teach writing across all grade levels.

 

Our long-range achievement goal is:  Students will write at or above grade level and improve their writing abilities by focusing upon grade level writing standards to write in a variety of genres. Since this plan is in its 3rd year of implementation, we are close to reaching our writing goal based on our 5th grade writing scores. This objective was chosen based upon the third and fifth grade Georgia Writing Assessment scores and the GCA supplementary writing assessment scores for fourth grade. Also, when comparing our writing scores to similar schools within our area, we recognize that we should have higher percentages of students to score in the engaging and extending stages of writing.  By focusing upon the Georgia Performance Standards for writing and 6+1 Traits of Writing, we hope to improve student writing related to the domains of writing that are formally assessed. Grade level teams will assess student writing using the Georgia/Cobb writing rubrics. Each grade level will create common writing prompts to give to students. Teachers will collaboratively score these writings in order to come to consensus regarding the levels of student writing.


 

Text Box: School Improvement Team Members

Elizabeth Mavity, Principal
Dianne Gurr, Assistant Principal
Tucker Smith, Assistant Administrator
Laurie Hendrix– Kindergarten Teacher
Lyssa Sahadevan– First Grade
Kelli Casey – Second Grade
Kim Judge – Third Grade
Sharon Jubelt – Fourth Grade
Danny Carlson – Fifth Grade
Leigh Lyjak – Accelerated Learning Program
Dawn Alexander – Media Specialist
Susan Thompson– Area Lead Teacher
Lindsay Durham - Special Education

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant Accomplishments

 

For several years East Side has performed very well in the area of reading on the Georgia CRCT and the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. The spring 2008 CRCT indicated that 97% of our students met or exceeded the reading, 96% in English/language arts standards. Sixty percent of our students performed in the exceeds category.  Our grade level percentage scores on the ITBS in reading exceeded our projected ability based upon the average percent of our grade level CogAT scores.  We received the Silver Award from the Georgia Department of Education for the percentage of students who met or exceeded the standards on the CRCT.

 

The 2008 CRCT scores revealed that 93% percent of our students met or exceeded the state standards in mathematics. Fifty-Four percent of our students scored within the exceed category. In order to improve this percentage, we will continue to implement Otter Creek to master our computations skills. We will continue to support our teachers with on-going guided math training.

 

East Side established a school Foundation that finished its third complete year in May 2008. The Foundation along with PTA works extremely hard to support our school programs, resources, and facilities. Both of these groups have provided our students with up-to-date technological resources, purchased instructional materials that support our school academic goals, and have assisted the school monetarily by upgrading our playground and classrooms. Examples of these would be the implementation of our science lab, the Fundations reading program in kindergarten and first grade, and the 6 + 1 Traits writing program.

 

The administrative team at East Side provided the staff with a survey (November 1, 2005) to evaluate the climate and culture of our school.  The survey revealed areas that needed to be refined related to our vision/mission, staff relationships, and methods of communication.  The administrative team asked for volunteers to serve as representatives on a ÒMorale Team.Ó  This team created a plan to use for the 2006-2007 school year to improve the climate of the school.  This was the foundation from which our school theme of Refining the 3 RÕs evolved. As part of refining/improving the morale of the school, we believe that it is necessary to establish some common philosophies related to discipline, grading, and professional collaborative communities. We will continue to discuss these topics as a staff and develop common school-wide practices that promote student success and are fair and practical. We implemented a book study by reading, Teach with Your Strengths. The book included an online survey that provided each staff member a list of his/her top five strengths.  This study enabled us to identify the much strength we as a staff possess.

 

In 2006, the local school tax referendum, SPLOST II, significantly improved East SideÕs school facility by painting and repairing exterior wood and improving other outdoor fixtures.  The interior of the school received fresh paint to the walls in the hallways, classrooms, cafeteria, and restrooms.  These improvements created a heightened awareness regarding the impact that school appearance can have upon a schoolÕs climate and culture.  Due to this heightened awareness, many parents and community members donated time and monetary resources to help a fifty-six year old school to have a fresh look while maintaining its character.  Through the school council and foundationÕs concerted efforts needs for SPLOST III have been prioritized. We are thrilled at the outcome of the vote and look forward to the construction of our new school!

 

 

 

Significant Challenges

 

East Side faces many challenges in meeting the goals within our School Improvement Plan. Two of our greatest challenges are our changing demographics and our emphasis on moving average achieving students to above average achieving students in the areas of language and mathematics.  Because our ESOL population is predominantly Asian, we will ensure that these students receive extra support to help them become more proficient in the English language through Extended Day Tutoring and volunteer PTA / high school mentors.  As we focus upon moving average achieving students to above average in the areas of language and mathematics, we will emphasize data analysis.  StudentsÕ test scores will be studied to determine individual progress in those areas. Based upon student test scores, teachers will hold students accountable for maximizing their potential. Teachers will hold themselves accountable by differentiating instruction to meet the needs of all learners.  We believe that the majority of our studentsÕ cognitive abilities are high average to above average based upon the CogAT tests in third and fifth grades.  Therefore, the assumption is that their ITBS and CRCT scores should fall within the above average range.  Teachers will be encouraged to learn and research instructional strategies and effective programs that will enable us to extend the learning of our students.  Varying the modalities of instruction to meet the needs of all of our learners necessitates our staying abreast of all technology applications.  Therefore, staff development will be integral to our success.

 

Another crucial challenge for us is to identify early our at-risk students and ensure that these students are receiving the necessary interventions to enable them to be successful. Each grade level will meet monthly to discuss the academic gains of our identified Òat-riskÓ students and discuss formal/informal classroom assessments and anecdotal observations that support student progress or regression (Data Teams and the RTI process). The administration will meet monthly to review the progress of the at-risk students as another intervention to ensure that these students have the support and interventions to enable them to overcome their areas of deficit.

 

In our third implementation year of the 6+1 Traits of Writing, teachers are collaborating, sharing lessons, and plans to continue building a knowledge base of writing for all teachers in all grade levels. This has greatly improved our writing at East Side, and as a result we had one of the largest gain score in the county. We are continuing to use 6+1 Traits and our own teacher ÒexpertsÓ to expand student achievement.

 

Another challenge we are facing is our math achievement. Twenty-Nine percent of our students with disabilities Did Not Meet the math CRCT Standards.   We are differentiating math instruction in our classrooms and providing training to help facilitate the implementation of Guided Math. We will continue to work with and refine the co-teaching models in every grade level to better support our special education population and to increase the overall number of students meeting and exceeding the math standards. County trainers will also help our teachers facilitate and improve this process. We are supporting the co- teaching models by providing training for these teachers and time to collaborate. During the monthly administrative meetings, where at-risk students are monitored, the guided math model can also be evaluated for its effectiveness. 

 

Collaboration among teachers has often been a challenge because of money and schedules.  Each grade level has chosen one day a week for collaborative planning time.  Teachers will plan for performance-based, integrated units that incorporate more than one content area.  Lessons will be designed considering engagement and higher-level BloomÕs Taxonomy.  During this time, teachers will design performance based-integrated units, along with formative and summative assessments.  During weekly grade level collaboration, teachers will be encouraged to reflect upon and refine their work.

 

Organizational Characteristics

 

East Side is located north of Atlanta and is 8 miles east of Marietta, Georgia. East Side serves a population of 980 regular education, special education, and kindergarten through fifth grade students.  East SideÕs enrollment has increased gradually over the past seven years.  The community surrounding East Side has also experienced a great deal of residential and commercial growth. As East Cobb grows, so does East Side.  There are 115 staff members including:  51 classroom teachers, 8.5 special education teachers, 2.5 gifted teachers, 3 speech teachers, 2.5 counselors, 6 specialists, 1 area lead teacher, 1 media specialist, 17 para educators, 1 registered nurse, 4 custodians, 8 food service staff, 1 secretary, 2 clerks, 1 bookkeeper, 2 cafeteria monitors, and 3 administrators.

 

Forty percent of the certified staff holds masterÕs degrees and 1% holds a specialistÕs degree. This results in 41% of the certified staff holding an advanced degree.  Eleven staff members are currently working on advanced degrees.

 

Our students live in single-family dwellings. East Side has experienced continual change in student demographics.  Our Asian population continues to increase. The racial composition of our school is predominantly white (69%), with our largest minority group being Asian at 21%. The African American population comprises 6% of our population; multi-racial consists of 3% and the Hispanic population makes up 1% percent of the school population. The percentage of low-income students (those eligible for free or reduced lunch) is 4.9 percent.

 

East Side's first School Council was created in August of 2003 in accordance with HB1187. The staff, parent, and business members are actively involved in advising the principal, reviewing school improvement data, and working to share school issues with the community. This has been an effective opportunity to promote increased communication between parents, teachers, and the community.

 

Student Performance Data Analysis

 

East Side Elementary School continuously analyzes informal and formal test data to develop our School Improvement Plan.  Each spring test results from numerous assessments are analyzed to identify strengths and weaknesses in student performance. The information is used to redirect teaching strategies and guide instruction.  Our school improvement data team disaggregates the data and shares results with the entire staff.  Once the test data is thoroughly reviewed, the staff decides upon areas of focus based on the identified weaknesses.

 

Because of our continued success in improving our reading scores, we have identified language/writing as our areas of academic focus for the 2006-2009 school years.  These goal areas were chosen based upon analysis of the following assessments:

 

The Georgia CRCT results for spring 2008 revealed the following data for the Language subtest: First grade:  48% of students meeting standards with 47% exceeding with an increase of 9% in the exceeds category.  Second grade:  54% of students meeting standards with 44% exceeding with an increase of 6% in the exceeds category.  Third grade:  54% of students meeting standards with 44% exceeding standards with an increase of 10% in the exceeds category.  Fourth grade:  46% of students meeting standards with 51% of students exceeding standards with an increase of 3% in the exceeds category. Fifth grade:  43% of students meeting standards with 55% exceeding standards with an increase of 9% in the exceeds category.  From this data, we recognize that teachers are working to meet the needs of our students and challenging them. With increases in the exceeds category in all grade levels we are working to even more students to move from the meets to the exceeds category.

 

The Georgia Writing Assessment results for grade three justify our continued goal to improve writing abilities by focusing upon grade level writing standards and to write in a variety of genres. Spring 2008, Georgia Writing Assessment scores indicate 85.5% percent of East SideÕs third graders scored in the Meeting and Exceeding categories in Ideas for all genres, as compared to 83% percent in Cobb, and 81% percent in the state. In organization, East Side scored 80% across all four genres, the system scored 78%, and the state scored 74%. In conventions East Side scored 81.7% compared to the systemÕs 77% and the stateÕs 69%. Our 5th graders had 90% of papers scored in the meets and exceeds category. Ten percent of our students did not meet the standards in writing. This was a substantial decrease in the percentage of students who did not meet on the previous yearÕs testing.  While we celebrate the 5th grade writing success, we hope to continue to increase or maintain the number of students who meet and exceed the writing standards on the 2008 writing assessment.

 

A concern with our 3rd grade writing scores is that schools within our area are scoring higher percentages across all domains.  We believe that our students are capable of achieving the same performance.  Therefore writing will continue to be a focus until we are insured that the level of performance matches our studentÕs cognitive abilities based upon our 3rd and 5th grade CoGat results.

 

Our spring GKAP readiness scores for first grade have remained consistent for the past five years. This is evidence to support that our students are capable of much success in literacy and mathematics upon entering East Side.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stakeholder Perceptual Data Analysis

Data gathered from CCSD School Improvement Survey administered to the parents, students, and teachers is used to assist in determining the strengths and weaknesses of East Side Elementary SchoolÕs instructional and organizational effectiveness based on the Georgia Keys.

Our overall frequency by domain

Curriculum- 88.09%

Assessment- 88.97%

Instruction-90.43%

Planning and Organization- 90.79%

Student, Family, & Community- 91.67%

Professional Learning- 81.76%

Leadership- 87.38%

School Culture- 89.59%

á   Professional Learning was only given to staff.

á   Professional Learning is our lowest area.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL MISSION AND BELIEFS

 

INTRODUCTION

The mission was rewritten this past summer.  The school-wide data team met with the entire staff to identify language that was important to include in the mission statement.  The data team worked together to develop a new statement. The mission was give to the staff and to East Side parents for review and input.  Revisions were made and the new mission statement was adopted.  All school committees, PTA, Foundation, and School Council will work to make the mission statement a priority as decisions are made that impact the entire school.

 

MISSION

 

ÒBy addressing the needs of all children, East SideÕs community is committed to empowering our children to excel academically and become respectful, productive members of a global society.Ó 

 

 

BELIEFS

We believe the following statements to be true about East Side and our mission as educators:


ACTION PLAN

Priorities

 

The Action Plan is divided into two parts---one for student achievement and one for school performance. The first section of the plan looks at student achievement. 

 

Our achievement goal in writing was chosen based upon the third and fifth grade Georgia Writing Assessment scores and the GCA supplementary writing assessment scores for fourth grade. Also, when comparing our writing scores to similar schools within our area, we recognize that we should have higher percentages of students to score in the engaging and extending stages of writing.  Furthermore, our CRCT scores in the area of language (spelling, grammar, punctuation) have been a relative weakness across grade levels for the past four years.  Reading and writing are reciprocal; therefore, we will emphasize writing across all content areas.

 

As we analyzed the data from the Cobb County School Improvement Opinion Survey, we identified for the fourth straight year that staff collaboration was a relative weakness. The staff agrees that in order for us to become a Òperformance-basedÓ school we must make collaboration a priority.  Collaboration is also a key factor in studying and implementing 6+1 Traits of Writing.

 

STUDENT LEARNING PRIORITY

 

Improve student achievement in written communication.

 

 

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE PRIORITY

 

Teacher collaboration fosters a Òperformance-basedÓ classroom and establishes a school foundation for teaching and evaluating writing.

 

 

 

STUDENT PERFORMANCE ACTION PLAN: GOALS

Student Performance Goal

Performance Indicators

Current Performance Levels

Benchmark

Students will write at or above grade level standards for a variety of purposes.

 

Student Writing Products Include:

  • Aspects of the writer's craft in texts that they read and apply their knowledge to their own writing.
  • Elaborate topic that includes supportive details.
  • Strong ideas that give a clear message.
  • Effective use of various sentence patterns.
  • Organization from beginning to end.
  • Appropriate use of grade level conventions.
  • Use of rich colorful precise language that communicates to the audience.

 

Students:

  • Follow the five steps of the writing process.
  • Use writing rubrics for self-reflection and analysis
  • Write for a variety of purposes - narrative, persuasive, informative, and responses to literature.
  • Write for different audiences.
  • Self-correct errors and reflect on their writing

 

 

Cobb/ Georgia Writing Rubric

 

Baseline data to be gathered during the 2007-2008 school year.

 

 

GA Writing Assessment

 

86% of third graders were in the Meeting stages in spring 2008.

 

30% of third graders were in the exceeds stages in spring 2008.

 

76%of fourth graders were in the meets and exceeds stages in spring 2008.

(66%  met and 10% exceeded)

 

91% of fifth graders were in the meets and exceeding stages in spring 2008.

(57% met and 34% exceeded)

 

 

GA Writing Assessment

 

90% of third graders will meet or exceed the writing standard of ideas by spring 2009.

 

35% of third graders will score in the exceeds stage in ideas in spring of 2009.

 

85% of fourth graders will score in the meets and exceeds stages in spring 2008.

(65% meeting and 30% exceeding)

 

95% of fifth graders will score in the meets and exceeds stages in spring 2009.

 (60% meeting and 35% exceeding)

 

On the 2008 test, East Side 5th graders increased by 14% in the Meets and Exceeds categories over the 2007 test.


 


 

STUDENT PERFORMANCE ACTION PLAN:  RESOURCE PLAN

Strategy# 1:  Incorporating the use of rubrics, ideas and organization to improve genre writing.

Year

What teachers will do

Professional Development

Financial Resources

Monitoring Plan

2006-2007

  • Create writing prompts (for each 9 week genre) to use as a pre/post test to show student progress.

 

  • Collaborative scoring with Cobb/Georgia writing rubrics.

 

  • Develop pre/post test for expected student learning with GPS conventions skills for each grade level.

 

  • Unpack the writing GPS incorporating 6+1 Traits strategies and vocabulary.

 

  • Teacher/students will assess student writing as a class.

Training

  • Collaborative planning to design assessment,
  • Essential questions, performance tasks (higher level BloomÕs Taxonomy) related to writing GPS.
  • Collaborating by grade levels to define/evaluate stages of student writing using rubrics.
  • 6 Trait writing process for all teachers.

 

Support
  • Administration will model the PBI process at all staff meetings.
  • ALT will demonstrate stage 1 of the PBI process.
  • Extended common planning times for all grade levels.

 

 

Early release days will be used to train teachers on 6 + 1 Traits of Writing.

 

Teachers will be provided with a training kit for 6 + 1 Traits of Writing.

 

Teachers will receive books for their primary/intermediate classrooms to reinforce 6 +1 Traits of Writing.

 

Training from national consultant, Mary Gunter, on literacy strategies for the primary grades.

 

Substitute teachers to release classroom teachers for in-school training.

Teachers will submit a web of writing GPS that displays elements within the standards.

 

Pre-assessment data will be utilized by the school-wide data team to identify baseline information.

 

Classroom walk-throughs will be analyzed and shared with staff to assess the level of teachersÕ expectations for student tasks.

 

Teachers will submit pre/post data results of conventions of writing to the administration.

 

Teachers will submit data from each 9-week writing genre to the administration.


STUDENT PERFORMANCE ACTION PLAN:  RESOURCE PLAN

Strategy# 1:  Incorporating the use of rubrics, ideas and organization to improve genre writing.

Year

What teachers will do

Professional Development

Financial Resources

Monitoring Plan

2007-2008

á       Teachers will collaborate to unpack standards other than writing and gain an understanding of all stages of the PBI process.

á       Teachers will develop informal mini-assessments to track student progress in various content standards.

á       Continue collaborative scoring with Cobb/Georgia writing rubrics.

á       Monitor students who are not making progress toward mastery of writing standards including conventions-by turning in data monthly.

á       Continue to implement the strategies of 6 + 1 Traits with teacher reflection and revision of writing lessons.

á       Prepare students to independently assess their writing.

á       Teachers will create checklists for student writing prior to assessment.

á       Teacher will collaborate weekly to design assessments, essential questions, performance tasks (higher level BloomÕs Taxonomy) related to GPS.

Training

á       Collaborating by grade levels to define/evaluate stages of student writing using rubrics.

á       Continued 6 Trait writing process for all teachers to incorporate additional traits.

á       ALT will continue to model how to develop checklist for writing prior to rubric.

Support

á       Administration will model the PBI process at staff meetings.

á       Staff sharing of instructional best practices will occur during monthly faculty meetings

á       ALT will continue to support the PBI process.

á       Extended common planning times for all grade levels.

 

 

á       Early release days will be used to train teachers on 6 + 1 Traits of Writing and PBI.

á       Teachers will receive additional books for their primary/intermediate classrooms to reinforce 6 +1 Traits of Writing.

á       Training from MRESA on literacy strategies for the primary grades.

á       Substitute teachers to release classroom teachers for in-school training.

á       School focused staff development funds.

á       Extended day tutoring funds.

á       K-8 reading and math funds.

á       East Side Elementary Foundation/PTA.

 

á       Teachers will submit webs of other content areas of the GPS that displays elements within the standards.

á       Pre-assessment data will be utilized by the school-wide data team to identify baseline information.

á       Classroom walk-throughs will be analyzed and shared with staff to assess the level of teachersÕ expectations for student tasks.

á       Teachers will submit pre/post data results of conventions of writing to the administration.

á       Teachers will submit data from each 9-week writing genre to the administration

2008-2009

á       Continue collaborative scoring of student writing through data teams using the commonly developed prompts.

á       Provide students with authentic feedback about their writing in the content areas.

á       Continued instruction of student self-assessment of writing products in the content areas.

á       Will analyze data to determine the effectiveness of the instruction of 6 traits.

á       Continue collaborative scoring with Cobb/Georgia writing rubrics.

á       Teachers will create checklists for student writing prior to assessment.

 

 

Training

á       Teacher leaders providing training and sharing successes.

á       Continue PBI training.

 

Support

á       ALT will model rubric assessment, checklists and student conferencing.

 

 

 

á       Substitute teachers to release classroom teachers for in-school observations of master teachers.

á       School focused staff development funds.

á       Extended day tutoring funds.

á       K-8 reading and math funds.

á       East Side Elementary Foundation/PTA.

á       Classroom walk-throughs will be used to evaluate the level of student progress and engagement.

á       Survey will be administered to students, parents and teachers about writing instruction and student achievement.

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE ACTION PLAN: GOALS

School Performance Goal

Performance Indicators

Current Performance Levels

Benchmarks

 

 

Collaboration among inter/intra-grade level teams guided by the Georgia Performance Standards. 

á    Teachers take leadership roles during the school year by presenting best instructional strategies and resources.

á    Teachers and students will implement their new instructional and technological skills in the classroom in order to practice, apply, and evaluate learning.

á    Teachers plan and design lessons together using Georgia Performance Standards in writing.

á     Administration will observe and walk-through classrooms to ensure implementation of GPS.

á    Teachers will collaborate as grade level data teams to drive instruction related to school improvement goals.

á     Teachers will collaborate to create common assessments.

 

All grades schedule consistent times to collaborate.

 

Student writing performance data is analyzed by individual teachers.

 

Teacher collaboration Survey 2006-2007 averages:

K-2- 3.01

3-5 -2.43

CRCT data shows improvement as a grade level

 

Student writing performance data is analyzed by groups of teachers.

 

 

Increase Teacher collaboration Survey to an overall average of 3.5

 

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE ACTION PLAN:  RESOURCE PLAN

Strategy# 1:  Use collaborative processes at each grade level and school-wide.

Year

What teachers will do

Professional Development

Financial Resources

Monitoring Plan

2006-2007

  • Create writing prompts (for each 9 week genre) to use as a pre/post test to show student progress.

 

  • Collaborative scoring with Cobb/Georgia writing rubrics.

 

  • Develop pre/post test for expected student learning with GPS conventions skills for each grade level.

 

  • Unpack the writing GPS incorporating 6+1 Traits strategies and vocabulary.

 

  • Teacher/students will assess student writing as a class.

Training

  • Collaborative planning to design assessment, essential questions, performance tasks (higher level BloomÕs Taxonomy) related to writing GPS.
  • Collaborating by grade levels to define/evaluate stages of student writing using rubrics.
  • 6 Trait Writing process for all teachers.

 

Support
  • Administration will model the PBI process at all staff meetings.
  • ALT will demonstrate stage 1 of the PBI process.
  • Extended common planning times for all grade levels.

School focused staff development funds.

 

Extended-day tutoring funds.

 

K-8 reading and math funds.

 

East Side Elementary Foundation/PTA.

Administration will attend and participate with grade level collaboration.

 

Walk-through expectation of students verbalizing GPS, scoring writing with rubrics, using common 6 traits language and performing activities with higher level thinking (beyond Knowledge and Comprehension).

 

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE ACTION PLAN:  RESOURCE PLAN

Strategy# 1:  Use collaborative processes at each grade level and school-wide.

Year

What teachers will do

Professional Development

Financial Resources

Monitoring Plan

2007-2008

  • Continue to increase the use of mini-lessons in order to enhance writing instruction.
  • Continue to develop common formative and summative assessments across content areas to use within a grade level.
  • Continue to refine performance based/differentiation activities for students and developed differentiated integrated units.
  • Grade levels collaborated to create one assessment for conventions of writing to be given and a pre and posttest.
  • Teachers will meet monthly to monitor the progress and develop interventions of students who are identifies as at risk.
  • RTI collaboration time that is data driven.
  • Teachers will provide learning opportunities to enhance authentic engagement of students.

á       School Focused Staff Development

 

  • Blocks of time to collaborate.

 

  • County quarterly trainings.

 

  • ALT will continue to model differentiated strategies and examples for content, process, and product.

 

 

SFSD Funds

 

K-8 Funds

 

Foundation/PTA

Walk-throughs assessing student products showing differentiation and engagement within the classroom.

 

Administrative observations of teachersÕ expanded mini-lessons for writing instruction.

 

 

2008-

2009

  • Collaboration to create formative/summative assessments.
  • Teachers will assist students monthly in setting goals based on classroom performance.
  • Teachers will analyze their own data to guide their instruction.
  • Teachers will implement the 5 stages of Data teams
  • Revise the first integrated unit and begin the second one.
  • Walkthrough data will be used analyze level student engagement.

 

Training

  • County, quarterly training.
  • ALT to train on common assessments and Data Teaming.

 

Support

  • Release time during school day for collaboration.

SFSD Funds

 

K-8 Funds

 

Foundation/PTA

Survey all stake holders

 

Data sheets and reflections

 

Integrated unit

 

Walk-through data

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.  Demographic Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grade

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-2009

K

150

166

165

167

1

134

154

156

142

2

147

147

142

170

3

127

158

167

163

4

149

147

150

154

5

139

166

169

176

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

845

             938

949

972

Student Enrollment Data

Year

Total

Enrollment

%

Black

%

White

%

Hispanic

%

Asian

%

American Indian

%

Multi-Racial

%

Male

%

Female

2003-2004

800

4

73

3

17

0

4

50

50

2004-2005

803

4

71

3

18

0

3

51

49

2005-2006

856

4

70

2

19

<1%

4

54

46

2006-2007

958

6

70

1

20

<1%

3

53

47

2007-2008

965

3

68

2

22

<1%

4

53

47

 

Student Program Participation Rates

 

Program

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

Free/Reduced

Lunch

21

2.55

29

2.55

45

5

47

4.91

36

3.79%

Special Education

79

9.9

79

9.8

83

9.9

93

10%

110

11%

ESOL

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

45

5

38

4%

34

4%

Gifted Education

129

16.1

76

9.5

84

10%

117

10%

72

11%

 

 

 

 

Student Retention Rates

 

 

Total

Number

Retained

%

K

%

1

%

2

%

3

%

4

%

5

 

BL

 

WH

 

HIS

 

OTH

 

Female

 

Male

2003-2004

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2004-2005

3

0.3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2

N/A

1

2

1

 

2005-2006

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2006-2007

4

0.4%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4

N/A

N/A

1

3

2007-2008

3

0.3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3

N/A

N/A

2

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STUDENT TRANSIENCE RATE

Transience Rate of

Students

Number

Percent of Student Population

2003-2004

94

 

10.89

2004-2005

191

19.04

2005-2006

95

19.06

2006-2007

121

11.9

2007-2008

132

13.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATTRITION RATES

 

Teachers

Administrators

Number

Percent of

Teacher Pop.

Number

Percent of

Admin. Staff

2003-2004

0

0.0

0

0.0

2004-2005

0

0.0

0

0.0

2005-2006

3

1.7

1

.5

2006-2007

5

7.81

1

.5

2007-2008

8

11.27

0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

 

Number of Teachers

Percent of Highly Qualified

Teachers Teaching in Field for Entire Day

Number of Core Teachers Teaching Out of Field for one or more periods during the day.

2004-2005

60

100

0

2005-2006

52

100

0